PROTECT! Civilians and Civil Rights in Counter-Terrorist Operations
An EWI report calls for new measures.
Including conducting a human rights impact assessment, to protect civilians in counter-terrorism operations.
An EWI report calls for new measures.
Including conducting a human rights impact assessment, to protect civilians in counter-terrorism operations.
EWI Founder, President and CEO John Edwin Mroz explores the qualities of leadership in the context of an ever changing world.
An EWI publication concludes that religion is not the cause of extremist violence, but is used as a justification for violent acts.
It contends that the role of governments in preventing violent religious extremism is limited. Religious leaders, faith communities and civil society must do the heavy lifting to counter this threat. The report, based on research and analysis, and the convening of experts with leading persons of faith, offers specific policy recommendations to combat violent extremism. It was launched at an event in New York attended by leaders from government, media, and civil society.
This short document outlines the plan for EWI’s Worldwide Action Platform to counter violent extremism and is intended to supplement and reinvigorate existing international measures.
Cyberspace allows for the quick and relatively low-cost dissemination of audio-visual material to all corners of the globe, a capability which violent extremists have been taking full advantage of.
The use by violent extremists of the internet and video formats disseminated on it is a well-known and increasingly disturbing phenomenon. The paper advises governments to distinguish sharply between strategies intended to suppress web-based aspects of direct terrorist actions or operations and those used to counter generalized extremist calls to violence.
Media Coverage:
Feb-22-2008: IHA article (Turkish)
International concern over the security of Pakistan’s nuclear facilities has significantly increased with recent turmoil there. But how justified is this concern?
Pakistan carries out a full range of activities relating to nuclear weapons: from mining and milling raw materials; through the production of heavy water, tritium, highly enriched uranium and plutonium; to weaponization. It also has an advanced missile program. Yet little is actually known about the security of all these facilities apart from the fact that they are guarded by a specially trained force of 10,000 separate from, but under the control of, the military.
The annual total income from the drug trade for movements such as al‐Qaeda has been estimated by the U.N. to be 2.4 billion USD.
The manifestations of narcoterrorism are manifold and far reaching: increased drug production; wide spread abuse of drugs; serious drug-related crime; threats to the rule of law, public security, and public health; money laundering; infiltration of the legal economy and financing of terrorism
Over the years, several definitions of “narcoterrorism” have been introduced. The widest definition is given by the Oxford dictionary (1999): “Terrorism associated with the trade in illicit drugs”. It does not indicate whether ideological and political or, criminal and commercial motives are the main driving factors. The simplest way of describing narcoterrorism is, perhaps, as a part of an illegal complex of drugs, violence and power, where the illegal drug trade and the illegal exercise of power have become aggregated in such a way that they threaten democracy and the rule of law.
The hard reality of security is that we are witnessing the dawn of a dynamic, multi-threat environment that has never before existed. How can we prepare?
The security environment of the future will be shaped by transnational threats evolving from wars, violent extremism, natural disasters, pandemics, and unaddressed systemic problems—including poverty, organized crime, and environmental degradation. Technology will remain a force-multiplier for violent extremists, not only for higher levels of lethality, but for propaganda dissemination. Real-time, global communication will exacerbate the psychological impact of potential threats and the aftermath of incidents.
With much of the Council’s resources committed to the Middle East, the Council would be wise to bring Turkey into the leadership fold.
The conflict zones it works in are as politicized as its process of appointing its members. The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) has entered an election year and will decide which states are best fit to be non-permanent members for the 2009-2010 term. Turkey is bidding for a seat in the Western European and Others Group (WEOG) along with Austria and Iceland.