Russia

Crisis in Ukraine - March 17, 2014

EWI offers a daily situation report on Ukraine's unfolding crisis, featuring key developments and links to analytical pieces from foreign policy experts around the world. 

 

Key Developments

  • On Saturday, March 15, Russia vetoed a UN Security Council resolution that would have declared the Crimean referendum illegal.  Aside from China’s abstention, all the other members of the Security Council voted in favor of the resolution.
  • After condemning the referendum, both the U.S. and the EU have imposed sanctions, including travel bans and assets freezes, on Russian and Ukrainian leaders over Crimea’s move to join Russia.  Both the U.S. and the EU have warned that further sanctions may be imposed if the crisis remains unresolved.
  • President Obama has issued an executive order targeting 11 individuals – seven Russians and four Ukrainians – including Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin, Crimean Prime Minister Sergey Aksyonov, former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovich, Putin aides, Vladislav Surkov and Sergei Glazyev, Valentina Matviyenko, the head of the upper house of the Russian parliament, and Vladimir Konstantinov, the head of the Crimean parliament.  The executive order goes on to label Aksyonov and Konstantinov as separatists.

 

Government Statements

The White House, Fact Sheet: Ukraine-Related Sanctions,” March 17, 2014

The White House, Readout of the President’s Call with President Putin,” March 16, 2014

Jay Carney, “Statement by the Press Secretary on Ukraine,” The White House, March 16, 2014

 

Analytical Pieces

Dmitri Trenin, “Crimea’s Choice,” The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace – Eurasia Outlook, March 17, 2014

Sergei Aleksashenko, “The Day After: Is It Technically Difficult to Annex Crimea?,” The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace – Eurasia Outlook, March 17, 2014

Mike Callaghan, “Is the IMF a political football in the Ukraine crisis?,” The Interpreter, March 17, 2014

Council on Foreign Relations, Interview of John B. Bellinger III: Why the Crimean Referendum is Illegitimate,” March 16, 2014

Paul Pillar, “Ukraine and the Zero-Sum Impulse,” The National Interest, March 16, 2014

Thomas L. Friedman, “The Three Faces of President Obama,” The New York Times, March 16, 2014

Graham Allison, “A ‘Belgian Solution’ for Ukraine?,” The National Interest, March 15, 2014

Colum Lynch, “Russia Vetoes Last-Ditch U.N. Effort to Prevent Crimea Annexation,” The Cable- Foreign Policy, March 15, 2014

Andrew S. Bowen, “Chicken Kiev: Will Russia risk an all-out invasion of Ukraine?,” Foreign Policy, March 15, 2014

Peter Liberman and Julie A. George, “Will Conquest Pay?: In Crimea, Russia Might Come Out Ahead,” Foreign Affairs, March 14, 2014

John McCain, “Obama Has Made America Look Weak,” The New York Times, March 14, 2014

Taras Kuzio, “Farewell, Crimea: Why Ukrainians Don’t Mind Losing the Territory to Russia,” Foreign Affairs, March 13, 2014

Fareed Zakaria, “Why (this time) Obama Must Lead,” The Washington Post, March 13, 2014
 

Crisis in Ukraine - March 14, 2014

EWI offers a daily situation report on Ukraine's unfolding crisis, featuring key developments and links to analytical pieces from foregin policy experts around the world.   

Key Developments

  • US Secretary of State John Kerry met with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in London on Friday for six hours. Lavrov stated that Russia will "respect the will of the people of Crimea.” After the meeting, Lavrov called the talks “constructive” but stated that Russia and the U.S. did “not have a common vision” on the situation in Ukraine.
     
  • Hundreds of pro-Russian and Kiev supporters clashed last night in the east Ukraine city of Donetsk in the worst display of violence since Ukraine President Viktor Yanukovych was ousted on  February 22. One person died in the violence, and several people were injured.
     
  • On Friday morning, trucks, troops and at least one armored personnel carrier (APC) were unloaded from a Russian warship, the Yamal 156, at Kazachaya Bay near Sevastopol in Crimea. The large landing ship can carry more than 300 troops and up to a dozen APCs.
     
  • Senior U.S. officials report that Ukraine's interim government has appealed to the U.S. for military aid, including arms, ammunition and intelligence support. Wary of aggravating tensions with Russia, the Obama administration has agreed to send only military rations at this time.
     
  • Russia's ambassador to the United Nations, Vitaly Churkin, told an emergency meeting of the Security Council that Moscow "does not want war" with Ukraine, as a direct response to a question posed by Ukraine's interim Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk.
     
  • A draft resolution has been circulated in the UN Security Council concerning the referendum in Crimea, planned for Sunday. Sponsored by the U.S., the resolution would declare the referendum illegal. According to council diplomats, Russia has pledged to veto the resolution.
     
  • The U.S. aid package to Ukraine stalled in the Senate on Thursday because of Republican opposition to the bill. In addition to opposing the IMF reforms tied to the aid package, some opponents, such as  Senator Rand Paul (KY), also stated that the aid would indirectly benefit Russia because of the billions of dollars of debt Ukraine owes Russia. Some Republicans, however, support the bill, with Senator John McCain (AZ) harshly criticizing those in his party for their opposition to the proposed legislation. The bill will be taken up again when Congress reconvenes on March 24.
     
  • Eight U.S. Senators, led by Senator John McCain (R-AZ), will travel to Ukraine this weekend to meet with the interim government.
     
  • Leonid Kravchuk, Ukraine's first president (1991-1994), earlier this month denounced Russia's invasion of Ukraine, stating that Russia has violated the Budapest Memorandum and that “Ukraine has every reason to go to international arbitration." Kravchuk vowed that he and every Ukrainian citizen would take up arms to fight for their homeland against Russian aggression.

 

Government Statements

Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk addressed the UN Security Council on March 13 at its sixth urgent meeting on the crisis in Ukraine

Press Briefing by U.S. Press Secretary Jay Carney, 3/13/2014

 

Analytical Pieces

The Editorial Board, “Fixing Ukraine’s Economy,” The New York Times, March 13, 2014. 

Wei Zongyou, “Ukraine Crisis: Can China Be More Helpful?,” The Diplomat, March 14, 2014.

Jamila Trindle, “Cutting off your Nose,” Foreign Policy, March 13, 2014. 

Alexander Motyl, “Why Ukraine Should Risk it All,” Foreign Policy, March 14, 2014. 

Susan B. Glasser, “Putin on the Couch,” Politico, March 14, 2014.

Robert Kahn, “Sanctions: What’s Next?,” Council on Foreign Relations, March 13, 2014.

John J. Mearsheimer, “Getting Ukraine Wrong,” The New York Times, March 13, 2014. 

 

Video

Ukraine's PM appeals to U.N. over Crimea (1:43)

Crisis in Ukraine - March 13, 2014

EWI offers a daily situation report on Ukraine's unfolding crisis, featuring key developments and links to number of analytical pieces from foregin policy experts around the world.  

Key Developments

 

Government Statements

The White House Office of the Press Secretary, remarks by President Obama and Ukraine Prime Minister Yatsenyuk after their Bilateral Meeting – March 12, 2014

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine Statement on National Guards – March 13, 2014

OSCE – A briefing will be held in Vienna to discuss a recent visit to Ukraine – March 13, 2014

 

Analytical Pieces

Thomas De Waal, “Toward a Scottish Solution for Crimea,” The Wall Street Journal, March 11, 2014

Wojciech Konończuk, “Russia’s Real Aims in Crimea,” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, March 13, 2014 

Geoff Dyer, “In the Battle for Crimea, China Wins: How Beijing stands to gain from Russia's invasion of Ukraine,” Foreign Policy, March 13, 2014

Daniel F. Runde, and Conor M. Savoy “Providing Aid to Ukraine is in the National Interest,” Center for Strategic and International Studies, March 12, 2014

Meghan L. O'Sullivan, “A Better Energy Weapon to Stop Putin,” Bloomberg View, March 11, 2014

Crisis in Ukraine - March 12, 2014

EWI offers a daily situation report on Ukraine's unfolding crisis, featuring key developments and links to number of analytical pieces from foregin policy experts around the world. 

Key Developments

 

Government Statements

Statement of G-7 Leaders on Ukraine – March 12, 2014:

White House version

Council of Europe version

 

OSCE Chair says Crimean referendum is illegal in current form – March 11, 2014

OSCE – Ukraine requests continuation of visit by unarmed personnel – March 11, 2014

 

Analytical Pieces

Dimitri K. Simes and Paul J. Saunders, “And the Winner in Ukraine Is … China,” The National Interest, March 12, 2014

Rajan Menon, “A Ten-Point Plan for Ukraine,” The National Interest, March 12, 2014

Nikolas K. Gvosdev, “How Putin Can Use Crimea,” The National Interest, March 12, 2014

Ted Galen Carpenter, “Ukraine Should Have Kept Its Nukes,” The National Interest, March 12, 2014

Harry Kazianis, “5 Ways Russia’s Ukraine ‘Boomerang’ Could Strike Asia,” The Diplomat, March 12, 2014

Brenda Shaffer, “Pipeline Problems: Ukraine Isn’t Europe’s Biggest Energy Risk,” Foreign Affairs, March 11, 2014

Jeffrey Tayler, “Sorry, Putin Isn’t Crazy,” Foreign Policy, March 11, 2014

Afghan Narcotrafficking: A Joint Threat Assessment - Russian Edition

Afghan Narcotrafficking: A Joint Threat Assessment focuses on the serious threats Russia and U.S.A. face from the flow of drugs from Afghanistan and its corrosive impact on Afghanistan itself.

Институт Восток–Запад рад предложить вниманию читателя русскоязычную версию доклада, содержащего cовместную оценку угроз, исходящих от афганского наркотрафика. Данный доклад является результатом исследований, анализа mи дискуссий между ведущими российскими и американскими экспертами по этой проблеме. Проект российско-американского экспертного диалога по афганскому наркотрафику задумывался как поиск инновационных подходов к ведению диалога и содействию повышения уровня доверия в российско-американских отношениях на этапе, когда они остро нуждались в «перезагрузке».

По нашему мнению, для того, чтобы достичь прогресса в российско-американских отношениях, следует использовать возможности для сотрудничества по вопросам, представляющим взаимный интерес, всегда, когда такие возможности представляются. Как подчеркнули президенты Медведев и Обама на саммите в июле 2009 г., и Россия, и США имеют значительные интересы в области безопасности, связанные с афганской проблемой, – и эти интересы в той или иной мере касаются вопросов производства и трафика наркотиков. От снижения остроты угрозы афганского наркотрафика выиграли бы обе стороны – более того, помимо укрепления безопасности России и США, конкретные меры и стратегии сокращения афганской опийной экономики содействовали бы и стабилизации ситуации в самом Афганистане.

_

READ MORE
 

Crisis in Ukraine - March 11, 2014

EWI offers a daily situation report on Ukraine's unfolding crisis, featuring key developments and links to number of analytical pieces from foregin policy experts around the world. 

 

Key Developments

  • Released details of the referendum offer two options to Crimean voters: to join the Russian Federation or to remain as a part of Ukraine under an abolished 1992 Crimean constitution that gave Crimea the status of an autonomous republic within Ukraine.
  • In what is seen as an American gesture of support for its eastern NATO allies, the U.S. has begun a series of military exercises with Poland.  Meanwhile, naval exercises in the Black Sea between the U.S., Bulgaria and Romania have been delayed by weather.  While the U.S. has claimed that both military exercises were planned before the onset of the Crimean crisis, Polish President Bronislav Komorowski expressed oblique concern for the Crimean situation.

Government Statements

Jen Psaki, “Daily Press Briefing – March 10, 2014 – Ukraine,” U.S. Department of State, March 10, 2014
http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2014/03/223197.htm#UKRAINE

“U.S. Will Beef Up Air Operations in Poland,” U.S. Department of Defense, March 10, 2014
http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=121808
 

Analytical Pieces:

Eugene Chausovsky, “Ukraine’s Increasing Polarization and the Western Challenge,” Stratfor, March 11, 2014
http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/ukraines-increasing-polarization-and-western-challenge
Chausovsky is an Eurasia Analyst and Director of Europe and Former Soviet Union Analysis for Stratfor.

Bruce P. Jackson, “How to Overcome the Ukraine Stalemate,” The National Interest, March 11, 2014
http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/how-overcome-the-ukraine-stalemate-10029
Jackson is the president of the Project on Transitional Democracies.

William Partlett, “Yes, Crimeans Do Have a Choice – And a Good One,” The National Interest, March 11, 2014
http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/yes-crimeans-do-have-choice%E2%80%94-good-one-10026
Partlett is a postdoctoral fellow at Columbia Law School.

Jamie Metzl, “Back to the Future in Ukraine and Asia,” Project Syndicate, March 10, 2014
https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/jamie-f--metzl-says-that-russia-and-china-are-reenacting-nineteenth-century-norms-of-international-behavior
Metzl is a partner in a New York-based global investment firm and a senior fellow at the Asia Society.  He formerly served on the National Security Council and the State Department during the Clinton administration.

Alexander J. Motyl, “Is Losing Crimea a Loss?: What Russia Can Expect in Ukraine’s Rust Belt,” Foreign Affairs, March 10, 2014
http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/141020/alexander-j-motyl/is-losing-crimea-a-loss
Motyl, an Ukrainian-Amerian, is a professor of political science at Rutgers University-Newark.

Kori Schake, “The White House Needs to Shut Up: Every time the administration opens its mouth, it’s only making things worse in Ukraine,” Foreign Policy, March 10, 2014
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2014/03/10/obama_putin_ukraine_russia
Schake is a fellow at the Hoover Institution.

Marina Lewycka, “Ukraine and the west: hot air and hypocrisy,” The Guardian, March 10, 2014
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/10/ukraine-and-west-hot-air-hypocrisy-crimea-russia

Leonid Bershidsky, “Anti-War Russians, an Endangered Minority,” Bloomberg, March 10, 2014
http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-03-10/anti-war-russians-an-endangered-minority

Video

National Interest Interview of Alexey Pushkov – March 10, 2014
http://nationalinterest.org/video/interview-alexey-pushkov-crimea-10031
Pushkov is the head of the foreign affairs committee within the Russian legislature.

Crisis in Ukraine - March 10, 2014

EWI offers a daily situation report on Ukraine's unfolding crisis, featuring key developments and links to a number of analytical pieces from foreign policy experts around the world.

Key developments

 

Government Statements

Secretary General of the UN, Ban Ki-moon, calls Crimea referendum “worrying and serious” development – March 7, 2014

Joint press statement of NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen and interim Ukrainian Prime Minister Arsenii Yatseniuk – March 6, 2014

 

Analytical Pieces

Andong Peng, “Ukraine – A Case for Chinese Involvement,” The Diplomat, March 10, 2014

Edward Luttwak, “Russia Wants Much More Than Crimea,” New Republic, March 9, 2014

Mitchell A. Orenstein, “Get Ready for a Russo-German Europe: The Two Powers That Will Decide Ukraine’s Future – and the Region’s,” Foreign Affairs, March 9, 2014

Judy Dempsey, “Crimea and the Cost of Playing for Time,” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace – Strategic Europe, March 10, 2014

Condoleezza Rice, “Will America heed the wake-up call of Ukraine?,” Washington Post, March 7, 2014

Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg and Bogdan Klich, “Disrupting Putin’s Game Plan,” Project Syndicate, March 7, 2014

Steven Pifer, “Honoring Neither the Letter nor the Law,” Foreign Policy, March 7, 2014

Keith Johnson, “Help Is Not on the Way,” Foreign Policy, March 7, 2014

Matthew Gault, “This Is Why Russia Wants Crimea,” Medium – War is Boring, March 7, 2014

Paul Pilar, “More Sanctioning Madness,” The National Interest, March 6, 2014

Cyberwar in Crimea? Franz-Stefan Gady for U.S. News & World Report

There is evidence of cyber warfare in Ukraine, Gady writes, but Russians will be cautious in carrying out cyber attacks or risk retaliation from NATO or Ukrainian hackers. 

Read the full piece on U.S. News and World Report's World Report blog. 

The current crisis in Ukraine has again made one thing very clear: Any future conflict will involve military activities in cyberspace. Last Friday, unidentified men seized several control centers in Crimea run by Ukrtelecom JSC, Ukraine’s telecommunications provider, essentially cutting off the peninsula from mobile, landline and Internet services. Conversely, RT (formerly known as Russia Today) was hacked by unknown assailants. There have also been reports that members of the Ukrainian parliament’s cell phones have been jammed. So far no other confirmed reports have emerged about cyberstrikes on Ukraine’s critical information infrastructure, and up to now hacker forums—a good indicator for “cyber mobilization”—have been remarkably quiet.

Of course, complex government-sponsored cyberattacks can evade detection, but the restraint shown by Russia is not without reason: Sophisticated cyberweaponry, such as the Stuxnet worm, is hard to contain and may affect Russia’s own network and communication nodes. A historical analogy would be the use of poison gas during World War I that could blow, depending on the wind direction, either way. However, the reach of cyberweapons transcends front lines.

The “blowback fear” is not as farfetched as it seems. Unlike Syria, where the country’s critical information infrastructure is highly centralized and where the Obama administration was contemplating cyberstrikes, Ukraine hosts a decentralized critical information infrastructure network and is served by many Internet Service Providers. As an analysis by Internet intelligence company Renesys states:

Ukraine has a strong and diverse Internet frontier, with more than 200 domestic autonomous systems purchasing direct international transit (out of a total of more than 1,650 domestic ASNs). The roads and railways of Ukraine are densely threaded with tens of thousands of miles of fiberoptic cable, connecting their neighbors to the south and east (including Russia) with European Internet markets. The country has a well-developed set of at least eight regional Internet exchanges, as well as direct connections over diverse physical paths to the major Western European exchanges.

Consequently, a “cyber knockout blow” will certainly have repercussions in Russia and other parts of the world. Also, unlike warfare in the real world, cyberwars are won and lost by private sector companies and their ability to protect their networks and spot attacks. Companies such as Gazprom and the Russian nuclear plants bordering Ukraine would be more affected by cyberstrikes due to their mere geographical proximity to Kiev. For now, both Russia and Ukraine appear to be limiting their cybercampaigns to minor exchanges mostly consisting of patriotic propaganda, low-key hacks, as well as physical protection and seizure of network infrastructures.

Russia also showed restraint during its 2008 invasion of Georgia when conducting its cyberwar campaign against the country’s digital assets. The attack consisted mostly of Distributed Denial of Service Attacks, which knocked websites offline for a few hours to days, jammed network communications and disrupted military communication nodes. Russia refrained from destroying civilian critical information infrastructure, such as power plants or digital records in hospitals. Some analysts argued Russia feared that a revelation of its more sophisticated cyberweaponry would tilt the asymmetrical cyberarms race between Russia and NATO even more in favor of the latter.

Today, NATO is playing a role in Russia’s consideration about launching a full-scale cyberwar against Ukraine, as well. NATO could quickly be drawn into the cyberaspects of the conflict by Ukrainian hackers planting false digital leads, which attribute attacks on NATO’s critical information infrastructure to Russia, pitting both sides against each other. Attribution, after all, is still one of the most complex problems in cyberspace, and the greater and more intense a cyberconflict is, the more difficult it will become to trace back the origins of cyberstrikes.

As during the Georgia-Russia War, patriotic hackers are the frontline troops in this conflict—the grunts of cyberspace. Ukrainian hackers have a reputation for talent and ingenuity, and it will be a hard battle for Russian cyberwarriors to obtain what the U.S. Air force calls “cyber superiority” (i.e., network domination), even if it is to Russia's advantage that much of Ukraine’s telecommunications infrastructure was built during the Soviet era.

Almost by definition, this will be a covert war, and we will see only some marginal reflections in public. In reality, there is no certain way to assess Russia’s true intentions and activities in cyberspace.

Yet, given what we know from open-source intelligence, Russia, will most likely exercise constraint in its activities in cyberspace during this crisis regardless of its outcome. The question whether cyberwar will happen over Ukraine is a non sequitur: Cyber may be the fifth domain of warfare, but it is the only domain that permeates all other spheres (air, land, sea, space); therefore, it will play a role no matter what. If a shooting war starts, cyberattacks—particularly on anti-aircraft systems, military and civilian communication nodes—may occur, but Russia will surely think twice before deploying the most sophisticated cyberweapons in her arsenal. 

Photo Credit: mediageek

Marten Explains Ukraine on The Daily Show

Kimberly Marten, a member of the EastWest Institute’s Joint U.S.-Russia Working Group on Afghan Narcotrafficking, and a professor of Political Science at Barnard College at Columbia University, appeared on The Daily Show on March 6 to discuss the situation in Crimea. During the interview, she highlighted the dynamics of Russia’s foreign relations and the potential effects of the decision to enter Crimea, offering recommendations Russia can take to “save-face” and promote positive outcomes for Ukraine.

To watch segment, click here: The Daily Show 

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Russia