Politics and Governance

Piin-Fen Kok Weighs in on U.S-China Cyber Relations

Speaking to Politico, EWI’s Piin-Fen Kok weighed in on U.S.-China engagement on cyber issues following the U.S. government’s indictment of Chinese hackers.

EWI’s Piin-Fen Kok was interviewed for Politico’s June 5 story, “China skips Track Two U.S. cybersecurity event,” which reported that Chinese officials had missed an informal cybersecurity meeting hosted by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington last week. Representatives from more than a dozen governments participated, including officials from the U.S. State Department.

A few days later, the U.S. State Department sent a senior official to attend a meeting in Beijing that was sponsored by the Chinese Foreign Ministry and the UN Regional Centre for Peace and Development. Representatives from more than 25 countries were at this event titled “Towards a Peaceful, Secure, Open and Cooperative Cyber Space.” China’s Arms Control and Disarmament Association and the UN Office for Disarmament Affairs also hosted the meeting.

The two meetings occurred after the U.S. accused the country of cyber hacking. Politico reported, “Officials in Beijing have denied the Chinese government engages in economic cyberespionage while simultaneously trying to shift the debate to revelations about the U.S. government’s digital snooping from NSA leaker Edward Snowden.”

Politico asked experts to discuss possible reasons for China’s decision to skip the Washington event. The director of CSIS’s Strategic Technologies Program, James Lewis, explained that there had been a scheduling conflict, which led to China’s absence.

He also remarked that China’s reaction to the hacking indictments will depend on the broader U.S.-China relationship, saying: “They’re probably having fits over the Hagel speech and the Tiananmen commemoration, and don’t know how to respond …They’re not very flexible when it comes to foreign policy and the cyber stuff will depend on the larger context”, referring to a speech made in June 2013 by US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, regarding China’s position as an ‘aggressor’ in Asia, and the memorials in honor of the 1989 student protests against the Chinese government in Tiananmen Square.

Kok told Politico that it will be interesting to see whether China uses its status as host of the meeting in Beijing to criticize U.S. actions or whether it will focus on promoting its own views on international cyber cooperation. “China wants to change the public’s notion that it’s a bad guy on cyber issues,” and this upcoming conference will give them a chance to do so.

Three years ago, China co-proposed an “international code of conduct on information security,” which would allow for more government control of the Internet. The U.S. has not shown support for the initiative and continues to support the current system.

At the workshop in Beijing, China’s Vice Foreign Minister Baodong Li “called out ‘a certain country’ for ‘double standards on the cyber issue,’ saying it had ‘concocted ‘regulations’ only applicable to other countries,’ though he did not name the U.S.” Outlining principles to guide Internet governance globally, Li mentioned peace, sovereignty, multilateral governance and universal benefit.

Following the hacking indictments, China suspended its participation in its bilateral cyber working group with the United States. Kok said that multilateral events such as the Beijing conference would allow for U.S. and Chinese officials to continue interacting on cyber issues. “It’s important to keep these channels open,” she said.

EWI's Piin-Fen Kok on Channel NewsAsia about Implications of Abe-Aquino Meeting

On June 24, 2014, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe met with Philippines President Benigno Aquino in Tokyo to discuss bilateral cooperation. Piin-Fen Kok, director of EWI’s China, East Asia and United States Program, talked to Channel NewsAsia about the implications of the meeting, and how countries in Southeast Asia are shifting their behavior in response to China's actions in the South China Sea. 

Excerpts from her commentary:

On the possibility of evolving defense ties between Japan and the Philippines following the Abe-Aquino meeting:

"I do think there will be closer defense ties; Prime Minister Abe has already advocated a more active security role for Japan in the region. As he mentioned in his speech at (the) Shangri-La (Dialogue), Japan has actually committed to providing the Philippines with a number of modern patrol crafts, and will be giving, or selling, a number of communications systems as well as providing training for the Philippines coast guard, presumably to help with maritime enforcement that would include dealing with China in contested waters."

On Japan's claim to deliver "utmost support" to Southeast Asian nations locked in territorial disputes with China:

"In his speech at Shangri-La, Prime Minister Abe said that maritime disputes should be resolved through international law, and he mentioned the rule of law of the sea and airspace and all of that, so I think in that regard he will be supporting Southeast Asian nations’ efforts to bring about a code of conduct in the South China Sea. As we’ve seen in the case of the Philippines, Japan will also support individual ASEAN countries bringing their case to international tribunals against China."

On whether the Philippines is concerned that Japan is looking to ramp up its security capabilities:

"I think there will always be lingering concerns in the region about Japan’s past some 70-odd years ago. It is up to Japan at this point, I believe, to state its case, explain clearly why it is re-interpreting Article 9 of its constitution, and to explain why that move will be a good thing for Asia’s security, rather than a bad thing."

On possible fears in Beijing that its recent actions may prompt regional nations to rally against it:

"Several other countries, including countries that themselves have territorial disputes between them, are coming together and meeting and trying to coordinate approaches—whether it’s to avoid incidents at sea and in the air, or to exchange information on how to manage a more assertive China. This might increase the pressure on China and make it feel more and more encircled. It may actually feel that it needs to take more assertive actions to respond to what it views as unreasonable behavior on the part of its neighbors, and that is not good in terms of reducing conflict in the South China Sea." 

Daily Ukraine Crisis Updates – June 24, 2014

Internal Security News

Diplomacy News

International Observation Missions

--

More Stories 

Writing for New Europe, EWI's Professorial Fellow Greg Austin argues that the creation of the Eurasian Union—a union between Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan—will test relations with the EU. Read more 

There were clear warning signs to the Ukraine crisis, says Greg Austin. "If we want to get that future plan right, we do need to have some understanding of what went wrong." Read more 

Greg Austin writes "The Luhansk Border: A New Crisis Point," for New EuropeRead more 

EWI’s Danila Bochkarev busts some prevailing myths and explains why the Ukraine crisis is a political earthquake and not an energy quake. Read more 

Bochkarev says the recent China-Russia gas deal is more practical than political. Read more 

 

EWI's Amb. Kanwal Sibal Discusses the Delicate Nature of India's Foreign Policy

Former Indian Foreign Minister and EWI Board Member Amb. Kanwal Sibal writes about the delicate dynamics of India’s foreign policy, especially with regards to countries with which relationships are crucial.  

India’s important position in international relations mandates the need for ‘hard choices’ that give the nation a defined set of foreign policy relationships and initiatives. EWI’s Amb. Kanwal Sibal emphasizes the need for "strategic autonomy," which requires India to acknowledge the conflicting interests it faces with regards to its major partners, pushing the nation into a delicate balancing act.

Read the full story at MailOnlineIndia.

Daily Ukraine Crisis Updates – June 23, 2014

Internal Security News

Diplomacy News

International Observation Missions

--

More Stories 

Writing for New Europe, EWI's Professorial Fellow Greg Austin argues that the creation of the Eurasian Union—a union between Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan—will test relations with the EU. Read more 

There were clear warning signs to the Ukraine crisis, says Greg Austin. "If we want to get that future plan right, we do need to have some understanding of what went wrong." Read more 

Greg Austin writes "The Luhansk Border: A New Crisis Point," for New EuropeRead more 

EWI’s Danila Bochkarev busts some prevailing myths and explains why the Ukraine crisis is a political earthquake and not an energy quake. Read more 

Bochkarev says the recent China-Russia gas deal is more practical than political. Read more 

 

Daily Ukraine Crisis Updates – June 19, 2014

Internal Security News

Diplomacy News

International Observation Missions

Governance

--

More Stories 

Writing for New Europe, EWI's Professorial Fellow Greg Austin argues that the creation of the Eurasian Union—a union between Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan—will test relations with the EU. Read more 

There were clear warning signs to the Ukraine crisis, says Greg Austin. "If we want to get that future plan right, we do need to have some understanding of what went wrong." Read more 

Greg Austin writes "The Luhansk Border: A New Crisis Point," for New EuropeRead more 

EWI’s Danila Bochkarev busts some prevailing myths and explains why the Ukraine crisis is a political earthquake and not an energy quake. Read more 

Bochkarev says the recent China-Russia gas deal is more practical than political. Read more 

A Crucial Phase

Writing for Pakistan Today, EWI Board Member Ikram Sehgal discusses the mishandling of militants in Pakistan and its implications. 

Better late than never, the much awaited assault on North Waziristan has begun, 75 days later than it should have. To quote my article, “Non-stop” of Mar 6, 2014, “The precision strikes of the PAF disrupted the TTP’s administrative and operational deployment. More importantly, ‘actionable intelligence’ was available for these to be carried out, that knowledge is bound to have made the TTP nervous. No collateral damage was reported, confirming these targets were pure militant bases. TTP badly needs time and space to regroup after suffering the PAF’s precision strikes and re-locate its hideouts to safer havens. The “snowline” at 8000 ft is preventing the militants from leaving the valleys and dispersing into the mountains before May. With aircraft/drones overhead this is not easy”, unquote.

Using their proxies within Pakistani civil society to campaign for “ceasefire” and “peace talks”, the militants got the requisite time and space, roping in part of our irresponsible electronic media to do their dirty work of spreading propaganda.  The govt’s vacillation has only add to the casualties, both among our soldiers and civilian non-combatants. Azb was the Sword carried by our beloved Prophet (PBUH) at the Battle of Badr, operation Hazb-e-Azb was preceded by extensive precision air attacks carried by the PAF. This took out a number of Uzbek and other foreign militants, including Abu Abdur Rehman Almani, alleged mastermind of the terrorist attack on the recent Karachi Airport. PAF air strikes, helicopter gunships, field artillery, etc are supporting the ground offensive. Possible exit points have been blocked by using heliborne SSG, supplemented by regular units where possible and necessary. One must not hold one’s breath expecting the Afghan Army to seal the border. In any case the plight of the disintegrating Iraqi Army in the face of Sunni militant onslaught is a harbinger of things to come in Afghanistan post-2014.

Asked during a panel discussion arranged by the US think tank Atlantic Council in Washington DC whether Pakistan Army ever planned going into North Waziristan, my answer “when good and ready” was met with scorn and disbelief. As our jawans spill their “blood and guts” establishing the writ of the State by clearing the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU), East Turkistan Islamic Movement (ETIM) and Al-Qaeda elements, one hopes the skeptical will be good enough acknowledge their sacrifice.

Operation Al-Mizan (2002-2006) was the first time the Pakistan Army went into FATA, “Zarb-e-Azb” is the 8th. Combat experience over a dozen years is a great equalizer, the battle conduct of well-equipped, motivated and trained troops  marks the transformation of this Army after the disastrous Al-Mizan into a truly magnificent fighting force top down through all ranks, accelerated after Rah-i-Rast (Swat 2009) and Rah-i-Najat (South Waziristan 2009).  Facing this juggernaut, will Hafiz Gul Bahadur and Mullah Nazir manage to remain aloof from the TTP?  Discretion will probably dictate they stay away. The sacrifices of our officers and jawans notwithstanding, without a dedicated Counter Terrorism Force (CTF) we will not be rid of terrorism in even 100 years. Instead of passively waiting for a “blowback”, the civilian law enforcement agencies (LEAs) need take to the initiative rooting out the militants from their urban hideouts.  Army units being used as a Quick Reaction Force (QRF) should never be deployed in urban areas. The Rangers have done excellent work in Karachi, simply beef them up and give them a free hand.

Pervaiz Rasheed “appealed to the whole nation to stand united behind the govt and the Armed Forces in the war against terrorism.” What a hypocrite! To quote my article “Dangerous Games” of May 14, 2014, “A dozen plus of Mian Sahib’s close political aides seem afflicted with the “Masada Complex”, pushing the Sharifs into a stupid no-win confrontation with the army”, unquote. Mian Nawaz Sharif has a number of sincere, committed and capable leaders, there are quite a few others who are not.  The PEMRA farce only goes to prove the PML (N) Govt siding with Geo against the Army.  In any case the PML (N) Govt has set the ball rolling for its departure in 3-4 months by the brutal police firing in Lahore killing 8 Tahirul Qadri supporters in cold blood. Evoking memories of the shocking PML (N) attack on the Supreme Court (SC) in 1998 was known PML (N) worker Gullu Butt running riot damaging over 20 vehicles and then celebrating by doing “Bhangra”. The SP in-charge publicly embraced this “Goonda” for doing a “good job”.  When criminals function in the name of justice, justice becomes a crime.

CM Sindh Qaim Ali Shah blamed the Federal Govt for the Airport attack, the octogenarian conveniently forgetting that while it was a intelligence failure both at the Federal and Provincial levels, that the base, logistics etc of the Uzbek terrorists were the prime responsibility of the Karachi Police and its intelligence arms directly answerable to the Sindh Govt. This public abdication of responsibility by the Province’s Chief Minister gives sufficient reason to appoint a Lieutenant Governor and put Karachi in a state of emergency for a period of not less than 2 years. A Taliban-led insurrection in Karachi could quickly spread over the country, we do not wait to descend into anarchy like it is happening in Libya, Syria and Iraq. 

KPK’s PTI-led govt is the worst affected by terrorism. Shrugging of the mind-games of PTI’s vociferously pro-Talibaan Rustam Shah Mohmand, Imran Khan and PTI are now thankfully supporting the Army action to rid this country of the menace of terrorism.  PTI’s leader must recognize realpolitik in Pakistan consists of a mix of conservative thinking blending pragmatically with liberal ideas.

The Pakistani electronic media has unfortunately become an inadvertent tool in the terrorist’s hands to successfully propagate their evil objectives, spreading venomous propaganda and creating fear and apprehension to demoralize the population and weaken their confidence in the existing system. Nowhere in the world is time and space given to terrorists as by our irresponsible electronic media. On the other hand they target the army on any given reason. In “Fight or unite?” of May 8, 2014, I had said, “Given that the freedom of the media is a must for sustaining democracy, the media must not use this freedom as a license to tar and feather the Army. Without their continuing sacrifices on a daily basis, the freedom that the media enjoys today would be lost, as would be the country. Close your eyes for one moment and imagine ‘media freedom’ under a Taliban-run country. We must remain within the parameters of good common sense and not cross fail-safe lines”, unquote.  

Appeasement is not an option, terrorism cannot be wished away – and certainly not by good faith and misplaced logic when your brutal antagonists pursue their living by your deaths. There is only one solution to the terrorist problem, and that is to eliminate it.

_

Read the piece here on Pakistan Today

Photo Credit: martnpro

Daily Ukraine Crisis Updates – June 18, 2014

Internal Security News

Diplomacy News

International Observation Missions

Governance

--

More Stories 

Writing for New Europe, EWI's Professorial Fellow Greg Austin argues that the creation of the Eurasian Union—a union between Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan—will test relations with the EU. Read more 

There were clear warning signs to the Ukraine crisis, says Greg Austin. "If we want to get that future plan right, we do need to have some understanding of what went wrong." Read more 

Greg Austin writes "The Luhansk Border: A New Crisis Point," for New EuropeRead more 

EWI’s Danila Bochkarev busts some prevailing myths and explains why the Ukraine crisis is a political earthquake and not an energy quake. Read more 

Bochkarev says the recent China-Russia gas deal is more practical than political. Read more 

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Politics and Governance